Survivorship of the dual-mobility construct in elective primary total hip replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis including registry data

Andrew Gardner, Hamish Macdonald,Jonathan T. Evans,Adrian Sayers,Michael R. Whitehouse

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery(2023)

引用 2|浏览10
暂无评分
摘要
Introduction Dislocation is a common complication associated with total hip replacement (THR). Dual-mobility constructs (DMC-THR) may be used in high-risk patients and have design features that may reduce the risk of dislocation. We aimed to report overall pooled estimates of all-cause construct survival for elective primary DMC-THR. Secondary outcomes included unadjusted dislocation rate, revision for instability, infection and fracture. Methods MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library and National Joint Registry reports were systematically searched (CRD42020189664). Studies reporting revision (all-cause) survival estimates and confidence intervals by brand and construct including DMC bearings were included. A meta-analysis was performed weighting series by the standard error. Results Thirty-seven studies reporting 39 case series were identified; nine (10,494 DMC-THR) were included. Fourteen series (23,020 DMC-THR) from five national registries were included. Pooled case series data for all-cause construct survival was 99.7% (95% CI 99.5–100) at 5 years, 95.7% (95% CI 94.9–96.5) at 10 years, 96.1% (95% CI 91.8–100) at 15 years and 77% (95% CI 74.4–82.0) at 20 years. Pooled joint registry data showed an all-cause construct survivorship of 97.8% (95% CI 97.3–98.4) at 5 years and 96.3% (95% CI 95.6–96.9) at 10 years. Conclusions Survivorship of DMC-THR in primary THR is acceptable according to the national revision benchmark published by National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE).
更多
查看译文
关键词
Total hip replacement,Dual mobility
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要