Criteria of quality in fiction-based research to promote debate about the use of AI and robots in Higher Education

Andrew Cox, David Cameron,Alessandro Checco,Tim Herrick,Maria Mawson, Richard Steadman-Jones

HIGHER EDUCATION RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT(2023)

引用 0|浏览0
暂无评分
摘要
AI and robots have the potential to transform Higher Education (HE) but pose many ethical and implementation challenges. To ensure the widest debate about our choices for the future of HE with these technologies, engaging ways to present the issues are needed and this article is part of an exploration of the potential of fictional narratives to do so. Specifically, the purpose of this article is to enrich understanding of quality in such fiction-based research, through analysing responses to a collection of fictions from a group of expert readers. A starting point was synthesising previous attempts to articulate notions of quality. The discussions with the readers suggest that the key qualities were substantive contribution, credibility, resonance, ambiguity and aesthetics; rich rigour and sincerity need also to be considered. Fiction has a place in educational research because it enables one to imagine vividly different possibilities, presents issues in an open-ended way, and is engaging.
更多
查看译文
关键词
Artificial intelligence, robots, fiction, research quality
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要