Exposure to gallium arsenide nanoparticles in a research facility: a case study using molecular beam epitaxy

Marco Rizzo, Michele Bordignon, Paolo Bertoli, Giorgio Biasiol,Matteo Crosera,Greta Camilla Magnano, Giovanna Marussi,Corrado Negro,Francesca Larese Filon

NANOTOXICOLOGY(2024)

引用 0|浏览1
暂无评分
摘要
We evaluated GaAs nanoparticle-concentrations in the air and on skin and surfaces in a research facility that produces thin films, and to monitored As in the urine of exposed worker. The survey was over a working week using a multi-level approach. Airborne personal monitoring was implemented using a miniature diffusion size classifier (DiSCMini) and IOM sampler. Environmental monitoring was conducted using the SKC Sioutas Cascade Impactor to evaluate dimensions and nature of particles collected. Surfaces contamination were assessed analyzing As and Ga in ghost wipes. Skin contamination was monitored using tape strips. As and Ga were analyzed in urines collected every day at the beginning and end of the shift. The greatest airborne exposure occurred during the cutting operations of the GaAs Sample (88883 np/cm3). The highest levels of contamination were found inside the hood (As max = 1418 ng/cm2) and on the laboratory floor (As max = 251 ng/cm2). The average concentration on the worker's skin at the end of the work shift (3.36 ng/cm2) was more than 14 times higher than before the start of the shift. In weekly urinary biomonitoring an average As concentration of 19.5 mu g/L, which was above the Societa Italiana Valori di Riferimento (SIVR) reference limit for the non-occupational population (2.0 - 15 mu g/L), but below the ACGIH limit (30 mu g/L). Overall, airborne monitoring, surface sampling, skin sampling, and biomonitoring of worker confirmed the exposure to As of workers. Systematic cleaning operations, hood implementation and correct PPE management are needed to improve worker protection.
更多
查看译文
关键词
Workplace,exposure,arsenic,gallium arsenide
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要