Tools for assessing the methodological limitations of a QES—a short note

Heid Nøkleby,Heather Melanie R. Ames, Lars Jørun Langøien, Christine Hillestad Hestevik

Systematic Reviews(2024)

引用 0|浏览0
暂无评分
摘要
The increasing prevalence and application of qualitative evidence syntheses (QES) in decision-making processes underscore the need for robust tools to assess the methodological limitations of a completed QES. This commentary discusses the limitations of three existing tools and presents the authors’ efforts to address this gap. Through a simple comparative analysis, the three tools are examined in terms of their coverage of essential topic areas. The examination finds that existing assessment tools lack comprehensive coverage, clarity, and grounding in qualitative research principles. The authors advocate for the development of a new collaboratively developed evidence-based tool rooted in qualitative methodology and best practice methods. The conclusion emphasizes the necessity of a tool that can provide a comprehensive judgement on the methodological limitations of a QES, addressing the needs of end-users, and ultimately enhancing the trustworthiness of QES findings in decision-making processes.
更多
查看译文
关键词
Qualitative evidence synthesis,QES,Assessment tool,Methodological limitations
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要