Impact of pre-admission physical activity on benefits of physiology-guided complete revascularization in older patients with myocardial infarction: insights from the FIRE trial

Rita Pavasini,Gianluca Campo,Matteo Serenelli,Elisabetta Tonet,Vincenzo Guiducci,Javier Escaned,Raul Moreno, Gianni Casella, Caterina Cavazza,Ferdinando Varbella,Giorgio Sacchetta,Marco Arena, Ignacio Amat Santos, Enrique Gutierrez Ibanes, Roberto Scarsini, Gianpiero D'Amico,Fernando Lozano Ruiz-Poveda, Jose Luis Diez Gil,Gianluca Pignatelli, Gianmarco Iannopollo, Iginio Colaiori, Ramon Calvino Santos,Andrea Marrone,Luca Fileti,Stefano Rigattieri,Emanuele Barbato, Raymundo Ocaranza-Sanchez,Simone Biscaglia

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE CARDIOLOGY(2024)

引用 0|浏览1
暂无评分
摘要
Aims The present analysis from the Functional Assessment in Elderly Myocardial Infarction Patients with Multivessel Disease (FIRE) trial aims to explore the significance of pre-admission physical activity and assess whether the benefits of physiology-guided complete revascularization apply consistently to sedentary and active older patients.Methods and results Patients aged 75 years or more with myocardial infarction (MI) and multivessel disease were randomized to receive physiology-guided complete revascularization or culprit-only strategy. The primary outcome was a composite of death, MI, stroke, or any revascularization within a year. Secondary endpoints included the composite of cardiovascular death or MI, as well as single components of the primary endpoint. Pre-admission physical activity was categorized into three groups: (i) absent (sedentary), (ii) light, and (iii) vigorous. Among 1445 patients, 692 (48%) were sedentary, whereas 560 (39%) and 193 (13%) performed light and vigorous physical activity, respectively. Patients engaging in light or vigorous pre-admission physical activity exhibited a reduced risk of the primary outcome compared with sedentary individuals [light hazard ratio (HR) 0.70, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.55-0.91 and vigorous HR 0.14, 95% CI 0.07-0.91, respectively]. These trends were also observed for death, cardiovascular death, or MI. When comparing physiology-guided complete revascularization vs. culprit-only strategy, no significant interaction was observed for primary and secondary endpoints when stratified by sedentary or active status.Conclusion In older patients with MI, pre-admission physical activity emerges as a robust and independent prognostic determinant. Physiology-guided complete revascularization stands out an effective strategy in reducing ischaemic adverse events, irrespective of pre-admission physical activity status.Clinical Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03772743. The Functional Assessment in Elderly Myocardial Infarction Patients with Multivessel Disease (FIRE) trial has shown that physiology-guided complete revascularization reduces ischaemic adverse events in older patients with myocardial infarction (MI) and multivessel disease. Older patients who engage in light or vigorous physical activity before hospitalization for MI have a reduced risk of the primary composite outcome of death, MI, stroke, or ischaemia-driven revascularization. These benefits extend to all secondary cardiovascular outcomes as well. In the present subanalysis of the FIRE trial, we find that the positive prognosis associated with physiology-guided complete revascularization holds true even for patients with a sedentary lifestyle. This means that this type of revascularization can effectively reduce ischaemic adverse events in older patients with MI and multivessel disease, regardless of their physical activity levels. Graphical Abstract
更多
查看译文
关键词
Elderly,Myocardial infarction,Coronary artery disease,Myocardial revascularization,Exercise
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要