The relevance of radial margin status in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: a state-of-the-art narrative review.

BACKGROUND:Prognosis of peri-hilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHCC) is poor and curative-intent resection is the most effective treatment associated with long-term survival. Surgery is technically demanding since it involves a major hepatectomy with en-bloc resection of caudate lobe and extrahepatic bile duct. Furthermore, to achieve negative margins, it may be necessary to perform concomitant vascular resection or pancreatoduodenectomy. Despite this aggressive approach, recurrence is often observed considering 5-year RFS below 15%, and 5-year OS that barely exceeds 40%. SUMMARY:The literature reports that survival rates are better in patients with negative margins and surprisingly R0 resections range between 19% and 95%. This variability is probably due to different surgical strategies and the pathologist's expertise with specimens. In fact, a proper pathological examination of residual disease should take into consideration both the ductal and the radial margin (RM) status. Currently, detailed pathological reports are lacking and there is a likelihood of misinterpreting residual disease status due to the missing of RM description and the utilization of various definitions for surgical margins. KEY MESSAGES:The aim of PHCC surgery is to achieve negative margins including RM. More clarity in reporting on RM is needed to define true radical resection and consistent design of oncological studies for adjuvant treatments.