Ventriculo-atrial shunt in idiopathic intracranial hypertension

Purpose CSF diversion is a recognised intervention in idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH), particularly in the presence of vision-threatening papilledema. Although ventriculo-atrial (VA) shunt insertion is a routine neurosurgical procedure, ventriculoperitoneal and lumboperitoneal shunts have been mostly used in this particular indication. This study aims to look at a single centre’s experience with VA shunts in idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH). Methods Retrospective case series with a review of electronic records over a 10-year period; exclusion criteria were duplication of same shunt insertion, no VA shunt insertion, paediatric patients and indication other than IIH. Notes were reviewed for demographics, shunt survival (defined by time prior to revision) and reasons for revision. Results Eight VA shunt procedures were identified in 6 patients (mean age at insertion 34 ± 10 years) with a mean follow-up of 58 ± 25 months. All shunts were secondary procedures; 2 revisions from lumbo-pleural, 2 from ventriculopleural, 2 from ventriculoatrial and one each from ventriculoperitoneal and combined lumbo-/ventriculoperitoneal. At 50 months, 75% of VA shunts had survived, compared to only 58.3% of VPleural shunts in patients with IIH. Revisions were required due to acute intracranial bleed (1 case)—revised at day 1, and thrombus at distal site (1 case)—revised at day 57. Both shunts were later reinserted. From the latest clinic letters, all patients had their treatment optimised with this procedure, although only two patients had documented resolved papilloedema post-procedure. Conclusions Ventriculo-atrial shunts are a safe and efficacious alternative option for CSF diversion in IIH. In this series, only 1 shunt was revised for a VA shunt-specific complication.