Clinical Experience With an Offline Adaptive Radiation Therapy Head and Neck Program: Dosimetric Benefits and Opportunities for Patient Selection.

PURPOSE:The objective of this study was to develop a linear accelerator (LINAC)-based adaptive radiation therapy (ART) workflow for the head and neck that is informed by automated image tracking to identify major anatomic changes warranting adaptation. In this study, we report our initial clinical experience with the program and an investigation into potential trigger signals for ART. METHODS AND MATERIALS:Offline ART was systematically performed on patients receiving radiation therapy for head and neck cancer on C-arm LINACs. Adaptations were performed at a single time point during treatment with resimulation approximately 3 weeks into treatment. Throughout treatment, all patients were tracked using an automated image tracking system called the Automated Watchdog for Adaptive Radiotherapy Environment (AWARE). AWARE measures volumetric changes in gross tumor volumes (GTVs) and selected normal tissues via cone beam computed tomography scans and deformable registration. The benefit of ART was determined by comparing adaptive plan dosimetry and normal tissue complication probabilities against the initial plans recalculated on resimulation computed tomography scans. Dosimetric differences were then correlated with AWARE-measured volume changes to identify patient-specific triggers for ART. Candidate trigger variables were evaluated using receiver operator characteristic analysis. RESULTS:In total, 46 patients received ART in this study. Among these patients, we observed a significant decrease in dose to the submandibular glands (mean ± standard deviation: -219.2 ± 291.2 cGy, P < 10-5), parotids (-68.2 ± 197.7 cGy, P = .001), and oral cavity (-238.7 ± 206.7 cGy, P < 10-5) with the adaptive plan. Normal tissue complication probabilities for xerostomia computed from mean parotid doses also decreased significantly with the adaptive plans (P = .008). We also observed systematic intratreatment volume reductions (ΔV) for GTVs and normal tissues. Candidate triggers were identified that predicted significant improvement with ART, including parotid ΔV = 7%, neck ΔV = 2%, and nodal GTV ΔV = 29%. CONCLUSIONS:Systematic offline head and neck ART was successfully deployed on conventional LINACs and reduced doses to critical salivary structures and the oral cavity. Automated cone beam computed tomography tracking provided information regarding anatomic changes that may aid patient-specific triggering for ART.