The challenge of standardizing CAR-T cell monitoring: A comparison of two flow-cytometry methods and correlation with qPCR technique

Juan Luis Valdivieso Shephard,Elisabet Matas Perez, Silvia Garcia Bujalance, Isabel Mirones Aguilar, Berta Gonzalez Martinez,Antonio Perez Martinez, Eduardo Lopez Granados, Ana Martinez Feito,Elena Sanchez Zapardiel

CYTOMETRY PART A(2024)

引用 0|浏览2
暂无评分
摘要
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy is a breakthrough in hematologic malignancies, such as acute B lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). Monitoring this treatment is recommended, although standardized protocols have not been developed yet. This work compares two flow cytometry monitoring strategies and correlates this technique with qPCR method. CAR-T cells were detected by two different flow-cytometry protocols (A and B) in nine blood samples from one healthy donor and five B-ALL patients treated with Tisagenlecleucel (Kymriah (R), USA). HIV-1 viral load allowed CAR detection by qPCR, using samples from seven healthy donors and nine B-ALL patients. CAR detection by protocol A and B did not yield statistically significant differences (1.9% vs. 11.8% CD3 + CAR+, p = 0.07). However, protocol B showed a better discrimination of the CD3 + CAR+ population. A strong correlation was observed between protocol B and qPCR (r = 0.7, p < 0.0001). CD3 + CAR+ cells were detected by flow cytometry only when HIV-1 viral load was above 104 copies/mL. In conclusion, protocol B was the most specific flow-cytometry procedure for the identification of CAR-T cells and showed a high correlation with qPCR. Further efforts are needed to achieve a standardized monitoring approach.
更多
查看译文
关键词
CAR-T therapy,flow cytometry,monitoring,qPCR
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要