Application of the Hammersmith Infant Neurological Examination in the developmental follow-up of high-risk infants.

AIM:To investigate the independent influences affecting the global score of the Hammersmith Infant Neurological Examination (HINE) in the early life of high-risk infants and to provide evidence for early effective screening and for evaluating interventions. METHOD:We conducted a prospective cohort study of 258 high-risk infants assessed by the HINE and Gesell Developmental Diagnosis Schedule at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months corrected age. A multiple linear regression model was developed to investigate independent influences on HINE global score at 3 months corrected age. The accuracy of the HINE global score was analysed by calculating the discriminant, concurrent, and predictive validities according to ages. RESULTS:There were nine independent influences affecting the HINE global score at 3 months corrected age in high-risk infants. The discriminant, concurrent, and predictive validities of the HINE for gross motor developmental delays at 12 months corrected age were all statistically significant (p < 0.05). INTERPRETATION:Different neonatal clinical settings are related to the HINE global score of high-risk infants early in life. The HINE can be used for longitudinal monitoring of neurological development in the first year of life in a typical Chinese clinical setting and the findings at all four ages tested relate to neuromotor outcomes at 12 months corrected age.