At the Intersection of Intersectionality

We sought to compare representation of intersectional (i.e., racial/ethnic and gender) identities among surgical faculty versus medical students.Health disparities are pervasive in medicine, but diverse physicians may help the medical profession achieve health equity.Data from the AAMC for 140 programs (2011/2012-2019/2020) were analyzed for students and full-time surgical faculty. Underrepresented in medicine (URiM) was defined as Black/African American; American Indian/Alaskan Native; Hispanic/Latino/Spanish Origin; or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander. Non-White included URiM plus Asian, multiracial, and non-citizen permanent residents. Linear regression was used to estimate the association of year and proportions of URiM and non-White female and male faculty with proportions of URiM and non-White students.Medical students were comprised of more White (25.2% vs. 14.4%), non-White (18.8% vs. 6.6%), and URiM (9.6% vs. 2.8%) women and concomitantly fewer men across all groups versus faculty (all P<0.01). While the proportion of White and non-White female faculty increased over time (both p≤0.001), there was no significant change among non-White URiM female faculty, nor among non-White male faculty, regardless of whether they were URiM or not. Having more URiM male faculty was associated with having more non-White female students (estimate =+14.5% students/100% increase in faculty, 95% CI 1.0-28.1%, P=0.04), and this association was especially pronounced for URiM female students (estimate =+46.6% students/100% increase in faculty, 95% CI 36.9-56.3%, P<0.001).URiM faculty representation has not improved despite a positive association between having more URiM male faculty and having more diverse students.