Sex differences and survival after TAVI for severe aortic stenosis

Abstract Background There is still controversy about survival rates and clinical response of women versus men who undergo transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) for the treatment of severe aortic stenosis (SAS). Purpose Assess mortality and heart failure (HF) symptoms following TAVI for SAS, according to sex. Methods A retrospective analysis of a single-center database including all TAVI performed in 2011-2019 was performed. Clinical, echocardiographic, and blood-analysis data were determined, and all-cause mortality over the five years after the procedure was compared based on sex. A reduction of at least one New York Heart Association (NYHA) class after TAVI was the secondary endpoint. Results Of the 488 cases analyzed, 252 (51.6%) were women. They were older (84 vs. 80 years-old, p<0.001), had a lower body surface area, and had a higher estimated surgical risk, as determined by EuroSCORE II (4.5 vs. 3.8, p=0.011) and STS-mortality (4.46 vs. 3.44, p<0.001). However, they had a lower prevalence of diabetes mellitus, coronary artery disease, and peripheral artery disease, a lower estimated creatinine clearance, and a lower frequency of previous pacemaker implantation. Women had more frequently a phenotype of high gradient severe aortic stenosis, with lower functional aortic valve areas. While there was no difference in TAVI design, smaller valves were implanted in women. Median follow-up was 46 months and there was a 40% mortality rate over the five years after treatment, with no statistically significant differences according to sex in both univariate and multivariate analysis, after adjusting for estimated surgical risk. EuroSCORE II had a statistically significant association with the primary endpoint (hazard ratio 1.03 (1.01-1.05), p=0.004). Despite having a similar NYHA class before TAVI, women experienced a lower frequency of functional class improvement (61% vs. 72%, p=0.034). Conclusions Although women had a higher estimated surgical risk, no differences were found regarding survival after TAVI for SAS. However, improvement in HF symptoms was less frequent in this subset.Table 1Figure 1