LBA37 Atezolizumab (atezo) combined with platinum-based chemotherapy (CT) and maintenance niraparib for recurrent ovarian cancer (rOC) with a platinum-free interval (TFIp) >6 months: Primary analysis of the double-blind placebo (pbo)-controlled ENGOT-Ov41/GEICO 69-O/ANITA phase III trial

A. Gonzalez Martin,M.J. Rubio Perez, F. Heitz, R.D. Christensen,N. Colombo,T. Van Gorp, A. Oaknin, A. Leary,L. Gaba Garcia, C. Lebreton,L.M. De Sande González,M. Romeo Marin, A. Redondo,M.P. Barretina Ginesta,J.A. Perez Fidalgo, A. Santaballa Bertran, M.J. Bermejo-Pérez, I. Bruchim, I.L. Ray-Coquard, F. Selle

Annals of Oncology(2023)

引用 0|浏览3
暂无评分
摘要
Standard therapy for late-relapsing (TFIp >6 mo) rOC includes PARPi maintenance if disease responds to platinum-based CT. ANITA (NCT03598270) is the first-reported phase 3 trial evaluating atezo with platinum-based CT and maintenance PARPi in late-relapsing rOC. Eligible pts had measurable high-grade serous, endometrioid or undifferentiated rOC, ≤2 prior CT lines (most recent including platinum) and TFIp >6 mo. Prior PARPi for rOC and/or prior immune checkpoint inhibitor were prohibited. Pts were stratified by carboplatin (carbo) doublet (paclitaxel, gemcitabine or pegylated liposomal doxorubicin [PLD]), TFIp (6–12 vs >12 mo), BRCA status (mutated vs non-mutated) and PD-L1 status (PD-L1-expressing immune cells on <1% vs ≥1% tumour area vs non-informative by SP142). Pts were randomised 1:1 to a carbo doublet + atezo or pbo for 6 cycles followed (in pts without progression on CT) by maintenance niraparib at an individualised starting dose + atezo or pbo until disease progression. The atezo dose was 1200 mg q3w or 840 mg q2w depending on the CT regimen. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) per RECIST v1.1. Between Nov 2018 and Jan 2022, 417 pts were randomised (14% BRCAm, 36% PD-L1+, 66% TFIp >12 mo, 11% prior PARPi after front-line CT, 54% prior bevacizumab); most (71%) received carbo–PLD and 74% began maintenance. At the data cut-off (15 Apr 2023), median follow-up was 36 mo. PFS results (Table) were consistent in key subgroups. Overall response to CT was 43% (95% CI 36–49%) and 45% (95% CI 39–52%) in the pbo and atezo arms, respectively. The safety profile was as expected from prior experience of these drugs.Table: LBA37PFSPbo + CT → pbo + niraparib (n=209)Atezo + CT → atezo + niraparib (n=208)All ptsEvents, n (%)174 (83)170 (82)Hazard ratio (95% CI)0.89 (0.71–1.10); p=0.28Median, mo (95% CI)10.1 (9.2–11.2)11.2 (10.1–12.1)PD-L1-positive subgroupEvents, n/N (%)60/73 (82)61/76 (80)Hazard ratio (95% CI)0.87 (0.61–1.25)aMedian, mo (95% CI)11.1 (9.7–12.7)12.8 (10.2–15.4)PD-L1-negative subgroupEvents, n/N (%)92/112 (82)97/117 (83)Hazard ratio (95% CI)0.93 (0.70–1.24)aMedian, mo (95% CI)9.2 (8.3–11.1)10.5 (9.2–11.8)aUnadjusted estimate. Open table in a new tab aUnadjusted estimate. Combining atezo with CT and maintenance niraparib for late-relapsing rOC did not significantly improve PFS or ORR.
更多
查看译文
关键词
recurrent ovarian cancer,ovarian cancer,lba37 atezolizumab,chemotherapy,platinum-based,platinum-free,double-blind
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要