Elimination of Emergency Department Ambulance Divert during the COVID-19 Pandemic Was Not Associated with an Increase in the Average Number of Ambulance Arrivals per Day

Aaron M. Burnett,Kari B. Haley, Matthew F. Milder,Bjorn K. Peterson, Joey Duren,Andrew Stevens, Danielle M. Hermes,Paul Nystrom, Joseph Lippert, Jennifer L. Moberg,Kurt M. Isenberger

Prehospital emergency care(2023)

引用 0|浏览1
暂无评分
摘要
IntroductionDuring the COVID-19 pandemic, ambulance divert in our EMS system reached critical levels. We hypothesized that eliminating ambulance divert would not be associated with an increase in the average number of daily ambulance arrivals. Our study objective was to quantify the EMS and emergency department (ED) effects of eliminating ambulance divert during the COVID-19 pandemic.MethodsRegional hospital divert data were obtained for the 10-county Twin Cities metro from MNTrac, a state-supported online system designed to allow hospitals to indicate their divert status to EMS. ED metrics are reported for a single Level I trauma center and were obtained by a deidentified data pull from our electronic medical record covering the 12 months prior to the elimination of divert (2021) and the 12 months after divert elimination (2022). The decision to eliminate divert occurred in November 2021, based on data available through October, with an implementation date of January 2022. The primary study outcome was to quantify the effect of the elimination of divert on the number of ambulances arriving per day at the study hospital.ResultsRegional utilization of ambulance divert increased steadily by 859% from January to October 2021 when 355 individual divert events occurred, totaling 809 h (34 days). There was no significant difference in the number of ambulances that arrived to the study hospital in 2021 (30,774) vs 2022 (30,421) p = 0.15. As compared to 2021, in 2022 there was no significant increase in mean ambulance arrivals per day (84/day vs 83/day, p = 0.08), time to room Emergency Severity Index level 2 (ESI) patients (28 min vs 28 min, p = 0.90), or time to obtain emergent head CT in acute "code stroke" patients (12 min vs 12 min, p = 0.15). Ambulance turnaround interval in the ED did not appreciably increase (16 min vs 17 min, p = 0.15).ConclusionElimination of ambulance divert was not associated with increases in the number of mean daily ambulance arrivals or EMS turnaround intervals, delays in ESI 2 patients being placed in beds, or prolonged time to head CT in stroke code patients.
更多
查看译文
关键词
ambulance arrivals,emergency department ambulance divert,emergency department
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要