The utilization of cryopreserved sperm in males with cancer

e18791 Background: Ten percent of individuals diagnosed with cancer in the United States are under age 45. Fortunately, improvements in cancer therapy have enabled younger individuals to survive with cancer related deaths decreasing steadily over the past 20 years. The American Society for Clinical Oncology (ASCO) recognizes the importance of future family building for cancer survivors and states healthcare providers should discuss fertility preservation options prior to cancer treatment initiation. Despite these recommendations, the data regarding survivor utilization of cryopreservation sperm is limited. The aim of this study is to assess factors that impact the post treatment utilization of cryopreserved sperm. Methods: 721 patients who underwent sperm cryopreservation for cancer indication from 1/1/2010 – 10/1/2020 at a single institution were included in the retrospective chart analysis. Cancer diagnosis, patient age at time of sperm banking, sample storage duration, and sample disposition were collected. Sample disposition included utilization for pregnancy effort(s), request to discard and/or donate to research, and lost to follow up. Descriptive statistics were employed via Excel. Results: Fifty-two of 721 (7.21%, 95% CI 5.4-9.4%) patients utilized their sperm samples for fertility treatment, and 104 patients (14.42%) subsequently requested their samples be discarded. When stratified by age at time of sperm banking, men who banked between the ages of 36 and 40 years had the highest rate of sample utilization for pursuing fertility treatment (12/68, 17.65%, 95% CI 9.5-28.8%). Importantly, those that cryopreserved sperm and subsequently discarded the samples ranged from 8.97% (21 to 25 years) to 28.13% (41 to 45 years). When analyzed by diagnosis, patients who utilized their samples for fertility treatment had varying cancer diagnoses with percent utilization ranging from 4.11% (skin/connective tissue/musculoskeletal cancers) and 20.0% (lung cancer). Overall, 75.59% of the samples collected are unutilized (545/721, 95% CI of 72.3-78.7%). Only 3% were lost to follow up, defined as inability to contact patient after three attempts. Conclusions: Cryopreserved sperm is widely underutilized with only 7.21% of patients utilizing the samples for future conception. Men between ages 36 to 40 years at time of banking are most likely to utilize their samples and utilization varied by cancer diagnosis. This large cohort (with less than 5% lost to follow up) highlights the importance in identifying additional predictors of cryopreserved sperm utilization in cancer survivors. [Table: see text]