Real-world analysis of cardiac, gastrointestinal, and hematologic toxicities between commonly used antiemetics in everyday oncology clinical practice

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY(2023)

引用 0|浏览1
暂无评分
摘要
6587 Background: Antiemetics are highly effective in chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. We utilized Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database to evaluate adverse events (AEs) caused by selected antiemetics commonly used in outpatient oncology practice. Methods: We analyzed the FAERS database to assess the cardiac, gastrointestinal (GI), and hematologic AEs for metoclopramide, olanzapine, ondansetron, and promethazine from 2013 through 2022. The disproportionality signal was analyzed by calculating Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI)—considered significant when the lower limit of 95% CI was > 1. Results: A total of 20,302 AEs were identified, out of which 8,135 (40.1%) were cardiac—arrhythmia and QTc prolongation; 8,656 (42.5%) were GI—nausea/vomiting, constipation/diarrhea, abdominal pain/discomfort, and dyspepsia; and 3,511 (17.3%) were hematologic—leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia, and pancytopenia. Compared to other antiemetics, promethazine and olanzapine had higher cardiac and hematologic AEs, respectively, whereas metoclopramide, followed by ondansetron had higher GI AEs (Table). Conclusions: Antiemetics are readily available and effective, yet the preference for a particular drug or drug combination varies. Our study highlights selected antiemetics AEs in order to help individualize treatment for this often challenging and frequently encountered entity. [Table: see text]
更多
查看译文
关键词
antiemetics,hematologic toxicities,everyday oncology,real-world
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要