Cancer weight of evidence for three lower acrylates: Conclusions and recommendations from an expert panel.

C R Kirman,P J Boogaard, J S Bus, V L Dellarco, L R DePass, B R Stern, S M Hays

Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP(2023)

引用 0|浏览4
暂无评分
摘要
An international panel of experts was engaged to assess the cancer weight of evidence (WOE) for three lower acrylates: methyl acrylate, ethyl acrylate, and 2-ethylhexyl acrylate. The review was structured as a three-round, modified Delphi format, a systematic process for collecting independent and deliberative input from panel members, and it included procedural elements to reduce bias and groupthink. Based upon the available science, the panel concluded: (1) The MOA for point of contact tumors observed in rodent cancer bioassays that is best supported by available data involves increased cell replication by cytotoxicity and regenerative proliferation; (2) The WOE supports a cancer classification of "Not likely to be carcinogenic to humans" a conclusion that is more in line with an IARC classification of Group 3 rather than Group 2B; (3) Quantitative cancer potency values based on rodent tumor data are not required for these chemicals; and (4) Human health risk assessment for these chemicals should instead rely on non-cancer, precursor endpoints observed at the point of contact (e.g., hyperplasia). The degree of consensus (consensus scores of 0.84-0.91 out of a maximum score of 1) and degree of confidence (7.7-8.7 out of a maximum score of 10) in the WOE conclusions is considered high.
更多
查看译文
关键词
Expert panel, Weight of evidence, Mode of action, Genotoxicity, Carcinogenicity, Risk assessment
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要