General Versus Locoregional Anesthesia in TEVAR: An NSQIP Analysis
Annals of Vascular Surgery(2023)
摘要
Background: Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair (TEVAR) is a minimally invasive surgery for repairing thoracic aneurysms and dissections. This study aims to compare postoperative out-comes of TEVAR performed under general versus locoregional anesthesia. Methods: Utilizing the 2008-2019 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database, patients older than the age of 18 years who received TEVAR, were identified using the following current procedural terminology codes: 33,880, 33,881, 33,883, 33,884, or 33,886. Patients who underwent concomitant procedures, those with both thoracoabdominal and abdominal aortic pathologies, and trauma cases were excluded. Standard descriptive statistics, in addition to c2, Fisher's exact test, and Mann-Whitney U-tests were used to compare patient baseline characteristics and postoperative out-comes between general and locoregional anesthesia groups as appropriate. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to assess independent predictors of hospital length of stay (LOS) greater than 7 days.Results: Of the 1,028 patients included in the study, 86.5% received general anesthesia, and 13.5% received locoregional anesthesia, such as local anesthesia with monitored anesthesia care or regional anesthesia. No significant differences were found between patients receiving locoregional versus general anesthesia in mortality (3.6% vs. 7.9%, respectively, P = 0.071) and morbidity (18.7% and 24.8%, respectively, P = 0.121) within 30 days post-TEVAR, including any wound, pulmonary, thromboembolic, renal, septic, and cardiac arrest complications. Pa-tients who received general anesthesia had significantly higher median LOS compared to those who received locoregional anesthesia [5 days (interquartile range (IQR): 3-10) versus 4 days (IQR: 2-7), P = 0.002], with 34.3% of the general anesthesia group having an LOS greater than 7 days compared to 21.6% of locoregional anesthesia group, P = 0.003. On multivariable logistic regression analysis, general anesthesia was found to be an independent predictor of pro-longed LOS greater than 7 days (odds ratio (OR): 1.72, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.05-2.81, P = 0.031). Conclusions: Locoregional anesthesia results in significantly lower postoperative hospital LOS with similar postoperative mortality and morbidity compared to general anesthesia in patients un-dergoing TEVAR.
更多查看译文
关键词
tevar
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要