Unprovability of Strong Complexity Lower Bounds in Bounded Arithmetic

While there has been progress in establishing the unprovability of complexity statements in lower fragments of bounded arithmetic, understanding the limits of Jerabek's theory APC(1) (2007) and of higher levels of Buss's hierarchy S-2(i) (1986) has been a more elusive task. Even in the more restricted setting of Cook's theory PV (1975), known results often rely on a less natural formalization that encodes a complexity statement using a collection of sentences instead of a single sentence. This is done to reduce the quantifier complexity of the resulting sentences so that standard witnessing results can be invoked. In this work, we establish unprovability results for stronger theories and for sentences of higher quantifier complexity. In particular, we unconditionally show that APC(1) cannot prove strong complexity lower bounds separating the third level of the polynomial hierarchy. In more detail, we consider non-uniform average-case separations, and establish that APC(1) cannot prove a sentence stating that for all n >= n(0) there exists f(n) is an element of Pi(3)-SIZE[n(d)] that is (1/n)-far from every Sigma(3)-SIZE[2(n delta)] circuit. This is a consequence of a much more general result showing that, for every i >= 1, strong separations for Pi(i)-SIZE[poly(n)] versus Sigma(i)-SIZE[2(n Omega(1))] cannot be proved in the theory T-PV(i) consisting of all true for all Sigma(b)(i-1)-sentences in the language of Cook's theory PV. Our argument employs a convenient game-theoretic witnessing result that can be applied to sentences of arbitrary quantifier complexity. We combine it with extensions of a technique introduced by Krajicek (2011) that was recently employed by Pich and Santhanam (2021) to establish the unprovability of lower bounds in PV (i.e., the case i = 1 above, but under a weaker formalization) and in a fragment of APC(1).