Smoothing tool design and performance during subaperture glass polishing

T. Suratwala, G. Tham, R. Steele,L. Wong, J. Menapace,N. Ray, B. Bauman

APPLIED OPTICS(2023)

引用 0|浏览0
暂无评分
摘要
During subaperture tool grinding and polishing, overlaps of the tool influence function can result in undesirable mid-spatial frequency (MSF) errors in the form of surface ripples, which are often corrected using a smoothing polishing step. In this study, flat multi-layer smoothing polishing tools are designed and tested to simultaneously (1) reduce or remove MSF errors, (2) minimize surface figure degradation, and (3) maximize the material removal rate. A time-dependent convergence model in which spatial material removal varies with a workpiece-tool height mismatch, combined with a finite element mechanical analysis to determine the interface contact pressure distribution, was developed to evaluate various smoothing tool designs as a function of tool material properties, thicknesses, pad textures, and displacements. Animprovement in smoothing tool performance is achieved when the gap pressure constant, (h) over bar (which describes the inverse rate at which the pressure drops with a workpiece-tool height mismatch), is minimized for smaller spatial scale length surface features (namely, MSF errors) and maximized for large spatial scale length features (i.e., surface figure). Five specific smoothing tool designs were experimentally evaluated. A two-layer smoothing tool using a thin, grooved IC1000 polyurethane pad (with a high elastic modulus, E-pad = 360 MPa), thicker blue foam (with an intermediate modulus, E-foam = 5.3 MPa) underlayer, and an optimized displacement (d(t) = 1 mm) provided the best overall performance (namely, high MSF error convergence, minimal surface figure degradation, and high material removal rate). (c) 2023 Optica Publishing Group
更多
查看译文
关键词
subaperture glass polishing,smoothing,tool design
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要