Dissolution Profile Similarity Assessment—Best Practices, Decision Trees and Global Harmonization

The AAPS journal(2023)

引用 2|浏览7
暂无评分
摘要
During the write-up of the meeting summary reports from the 2019 dissolution similarity workshop held at the University of Maryland’s Center of Excellence in Regulatory Science and Innovation (M-CERSI), several coauthors continued their discussions to develop a “best-practice” document defining the steps required to assess dissolution profiles in support of certain biowaivers and postapproval changes. In previous reports, current challenges related to dissolution profile studies were discussed such that the steps outlined in the two flow charts (“decision trees”) presented here can be applied. These decision trees include both recommendations for the use of equivalence procedures between reference and test products as well as application of the dissolution safe space concept. Common approaches towards establishing dissolution safe spaces are described. This paper encourages the preparation of protocols clearly describing why and how testing is performed along with the expected pass/fail criteria prior to generating data on the materials to be evaluated. The target audience of this manuscript includes CMC regulatory scientists, laboratory analysts, as well as statisticians from industry and regulatory health agencies involved in the assessment of product quality via in vitro  dissolution testing. Building upon previous publications, this manuscript provides a solution to the current ambiguity related to dissolution profile comparison. The principles outlined in this and previous manuscripts provide a basis for global regulatory alignment in the application of dissolution profile assessment to support manufacturing changes and biowaiver requests. Graphical Abstract
更多
查看译文
关键词
clinically relevant dissolution specifications,decision tree,dissolution profile similarity,safe space,unknown clinical relevance approaches
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要