A Systematic Review on COVID-19 Vaccine preferences using Discrete Choice Experiments

Objective To determine the attributes of COVID-19 vaccines that influence vaccine acceptance using a DCE through a systematic review. Methods A systematic search was carried out for articles published up to November 2021 in the PubMed, Psycinfo, Embase, Web of Science, and Global Index Medicus databases. The electronic search algorithm consisted of the terms (Covid-19) AND (Vaccine) AND (discrete choice experiment). Findings A total of 39 records were retrieved of which 18 duplicates were identified and removed. Of the remaining 21 records, 10 were excluded because they did not use a DCE approach. 11 studies were included in the meta-analyses with a total of 42 795 participants from three WHO regions. We examined 13 attributes of COVID-19 vaccine that influenced acceptance; cost, vaccine efficacy, number of doses, risk of side effects, proof of vaccination, vaccination setting, duration of immunity, doctor’s recommendation, proportion of acquaintances vaccinated, region of vaccine manufacture, background knowledge of herd immunity, life attenuated or mRNA, speed of vaccination development. The four attributes reported to influence COVID-19 vaccine preferences most worldwide were; high vaccine efficacy, low risk of side effects, long duration of immunity and low number of doses of the vaccine. Conclusion The most preferred COVID-19 vaccine attributes should be taken into account by vaccine manufacturers and public health policy makers for better introduction and acceptance of COVID-19 vaccine to the world. ### Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. ### Funding Statement This study was funded by ### Author Declarations I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained. Yes The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below: I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals. Yes I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance). Yes I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable. Yes All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript