Y The importance of pharmacists in modern day surgery

Surgical care delivery, which consists primarily of surgical personnel and physical resources, is an important aspect of health care that has evolved significantly over time. The importance of a multidisciplinary healthcare (MDH) approach in modern healthcare delivery, particularly surgery, cannot be overstated due to the enormous benefits and value it has added to patient care. Since the introduction of concepts of pharmaceutical care and drug therapy in surgical services in the 1980s, the concept of integrating pharmacists in surgical services has not been widely utilized1,2. Nonetheless, pharmacists’ primary responsibilities back then were medication distribution and regulatory compliance, but this has changed in recent years1. Clinical pharmacists (CPs) have been well integrated into healthcare systems, particularly in many developed nations, but the need for CPs in surgical care, unlike other subspecialties, is not well discussed in the literature. Several studies have found that drug administration errors are the most common in surgical delivery, particularly during anesthesia care3. According to a study conducted by Nanji et al.3, 5.3% of medication administrations during 277 surgeries were incorrect, and 79.3% were avoidable. A number of recent papers have discussed the critical importance of CPs in surgical procedures, and they are primarily trained in detecting and correcting these errors associated with drug administration2,4. CPs have the potential to collaborate with surgeons and make meaningful contributions. Other significant benefits of CP integration into surgical care include improving the quality of care, limiting patient costs, and, most importantly, reducing mortality4. This editorial aims to highlight the primary roles of CPs in surgical care, as well as their benefits, challenges, and recommendations. The roles and benefits of CPs in surgery Perioperative enhanced recovery programs have been established in recent years and have significantly influenced surgical care around the world5. One notable strategy used by these enhanced recovery programs is the inclusion of CPs and pharmacologists in surgical procedures to achieve desired results5. The role of CPs during surgical procedures and even in other specialties is unquestionably necessary for efficient healthcare delivery and positive patient outcomes4–6. The Perioperative Clinical Pharmacist has advanced therapeutic knowledge and experience in order to ensure appropriate medication use and patient outcomes throughout the surgical procedure. They are also responsible and accountable for correcting any medication-related issues that may arise during the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative phases for all surgical patients6. During the preoperative period, the CP ensures fluid status optimization, appropriate analgesia administration, antimicrobial prophylaxis, and venous thromboembolism prophylaxis6. At the intraoperative stage, the CP ensures that antimicrobial prophylaxis, fluid resuscitation, and anesthetic plans are redosed. Opioid doses are adjusted based on the patient’s tolerance and adverse effects6. During the postoperative period, the patient receives medication monitoring, withdrawal of strong opioids, and counseling. The CPs offer a unique perspective on the multidisciplinary nature of perioperative teams and the impact of their collaboration on the outcome of surgical procedures4,5. Due to their training and knowledge in medication safety, CPs can comprehend and participate in the analysis of the root causes of surgical complications5. Furthermore, CPs are skilled at implementing a systematic approach to surgical care, which includes the acquisition, sorting, and evaluation of patient data by actively collecting medication-related data and keeping records5. They are also well-positioned to educate surgical patients about what to expect as a result of exposure to certain drugs that may be used prior to, during, and after surgical procedures5,7. The CP intervention during the surgical procedure, according to Luo et al., amounted to providing extended educational sessions and a booklet containing the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, indications, duration, and dose of stress ulcer prophylaxis to the surgical residents who prescribe acid suppressants and the nurses who dispense them. In addition, CPs collected information about surgical patients from electronic medical records and hospital information systems to analyze the appropriate use of prophylactic acid suppressants and other medications in terms of dose, duration, combination, and replacement therapy7. The majority of these studies highlighting the need for CPs have discussed the enormous value and benefits that CPs bring to surgical teams. Some of the main benefits of CP integration include reduced drug administration errors, adverse drug effects, shorter hospital stays, lower costs, and many more4,5. This is supported by Leape et al.8, who found that integrating critical care pharmacists reduced adverse drug effects by 66%, saving USD 270,000 per year. Another study conducted in a Canadian hospital found that all patients admitted for surgery saved between CA$1518 and CA$3048 with CP integration4. A review of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery value-based surgery revealed that the presence of a pharmacist saved approximately €153–€6537 per colorectal case9. A systematic review of studies in southern Asia found that CP interventions can improve therapeutic and safety outcomes for patients, as well as humanistic outcomes such as disease knowledge and treatment adherence10. For example, Ahmed et al.10 found that CP interventions significantly reduced the odds of medication errors by 73%. Upadhyay et al. also found that CP interventions significantly decreased the direct healthcare costs of patients, with a greater reduction in drug costs and investigation costs. Bond and Raehl11 further highlighted that pharmacist involvement in surgical antibiotic prophylaxis led to a 52.1% lower mortality rate, a 10.2% reduction in length of stay, and a 34.3% lower incidence of postoperative infections. Additionally, 90% of physicians surveyed by Moreno et al.12 agreed that pharmacists’ recommendations are clinically helpful, and pharmacists have increased their knowledge of the medications they prescribe. These findings emphasize the importance of pharmacist involvement in reducing medication errors and costs in all populations. Is there any regard for CPs in the clinical setting and surgical delivery in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs)? Several studies have demonstrated that interprofessional collaboration and a collaborative practice framework improve overall patient outcomes13. As a result, healthcare providers, particularly physicians and pharmacists, must work together to improve healthcare and overall patient outcomes. However, multidisciplinary collaborations for effective surgical delivery are uncommon and are only used in a few LMICs. This is primarily due to a misunderstanding of pharmacists’ and other nonphysician essential roles in healthcare delivery, particularly surgery14,15. This is reflected in the belief that pharmacists may provide incorrect prescription information, illegal refills, and/or inappropriate comments to patients. According to an Alipour poll, three-fifths (63.1%) of respondents believed that pharmacists should not be given the authority to write repeat prescriptions on their own14. CPs are undervalued and underrepresented in surgical delivery and multidisciplinary teams globally, particularly in LMICs16. A study in an Ethiopian hospital discovered a 76% drug therapy problem in surgical wards, highlighting the importance of CPs during surgical procedures2. The typical role of CPs is poorly understood, as evidenced by a study in which most LMICs believe that pharmacist training is typically geared toward the industrial sector15. Noninvolvement of CPs in LMICs increases the risk of medication errors, inadequate pain and symptom management, and inadequate management of postsurgical complications17–19, which can have serious consequences such as adverse drug reactions, prolonged hospital stays, and even high mortality. There is a shortage of trained healthcare workers who are qualified to administer medications in surgical settings in many LMICs. Furthermore, there is a huge disparity between health workers and patients, which makes physicians prone to mistakes and errors, which can have serious consequences for patients20. The major obstacles to the effective practice of incorporating CPs during surgeries differ from one geographical location to the next15. Many LMICs lack trained CPs who are qualified to work in surgical settings. Malaysia, for example, has a pharmacist-to-patient ratio of 1 : 6207, and Ghana has only 619 pharmacists serving a population of 2.9 million in their capital region, Accra15, which falls far short of the WHO recommendation of 1 : 2000. Furthermore, CPs are frequently not fully integrated into surgical teams, and in many cases, they are not involved in decision-making nor consulted about medication management during surgery. Many LMICs lack surgical clinical pharmacy facilities, including a lack of space and equipment, as well as limited access to necessary resources, such as medications and surgical supplies, making it difficult for CPs to provide the level of care that patients require15,21. Recommendations It is evident that CPs have a tremendous opportunity to improve clinical outcomes, particularly surgical care. However, a number of countries, particularly LMICs, do not meet the WHO recommendation of a pharmacist-to-patient ratio of 1 : 2000. All countries, particularly LMICs, should prioritize training more CPs to work in clinical and surgical settings to improve patient care. To encourage pharmacists to pursue advanced clinical training, nations should prioritize developing a career structure that supports clinical development and specialization in practice. Institutions should also include more clinical content and experiential learning opportunities in the undergraduate pharmacy training curriculum and conduct these at clinical pharmacy service locations. More funding for postgraduate clinical pharmacy programs would help pharmacists improve their clinical skills and confidence in clinical settings. MDH approaches should be widely encouraged and adopted globally, particularly in LMICs, to achieve high-quality results in patient care. Pharmacists should be included in MDH approaches because most CP engagements in healthcare settings have yielded excellent results thus far. Governments should invest in the development of clinical pharmacy facilities in surgical settings, as well as in the provision of necessary resources such as medications and surgical supplies. Nonphysician healthcare providers, such as CPs, should be fully integrated into surgical teams and involved in decision-making and medication management during surgery. Stakeholders, including doctors and other healthcare professionals, should be more aware of pharmacists’ expanded role in patient care and the value of clinical pharmacy practice. Given the scarcity of data on the outcomes of CPs integration into surgical settings, more research should be conducted to provide additional confirmation on CPs impacts. Ethical approval Not applicable. Sources of funding None. Author contribution A.A.W.: conceptualized ideas. All authors were involved in the process of data curation, writing of the initial draft, and review and editing. All authors approved the final manuscript. Conflicts of interest disclosure There are no conflicts of interest. Research registration unique identifying number (UIN) 1. Name of the registry: NA. 2. Unique identifying number or registration ID: NA. 3. Hyperlink to your specific registration (must be publicly accessible and will be checked): NA. Guarantor Andrew Awuah Wireko. Consent for publication Not applicable. Data availability No new data were generated.