Interprofessional learning through discussions of troubled sex/gender in mental health care: a case study

PurposeThis study aims to investigate how aspects of the sex/gender were scrutinized in a team's production of clinical guidelines for psychiatric compulsory care and what the implications were for the final guidelines and for interprofessional learning. Design/methodology/approachThe study is a case study, where interviews were conducted and a narrative analysis was used. FindingsThe results reflected how sex/gender arose in a discussion about gender differences when using restraining belts. Furthermore, discussions are presented where profession-specific experiences and knowledge about sex/gender appeared to stimulate interprofessional learning. However, the team's learning about the complexity of sex/gender resulted in guidelines that emphasized aspects of power and focused on the individual patient. Thus, discussions leading to analysis and learning related to gender paradoxically produced guidelines that were gender-neutral. Originality/valueThe study highlights the potential interprofessional learning in discussions of sex/gender and its complex relation in medicine.