Comparison of surgical and obstetric outcomes in women with uterine leiomyomas after laparoscopic vs. abdominal myomectomy: A single-center cohort study.

Polán Ordás,Emanuela Spagnolo, Lucía Gómez-Lavín Fernández,María Dolores Diestro Tejeda, Pilar Lafuente,Patricia Salas,Ana Lopez Carrasco, María Carbonell,Alicia Hernández

Frontiers in surgery(2022)

引用 1|浏览4
暂无评分
摘要
Our aim was to study the advantages, complications and obstetrical outcomes of laparoscopic myomectomy (LM) compared with abdominal myomectomy (AM). We conducted a retrospective cohort study at La Paz University Hospital that included LMs and AMs performed between 2012 and 2018, analyzing 254 myomectomies (142 AMs [55.7%] and 112 LMs [43.9%]). The mean number of fibroids was 1.8 ± 1.5 and 3 ± 2.9 for the LM and AM groups, respectively ( < 0.006). The mean size of the largest myoma was 7.6 cm ± 2.7 cm and 10.2 cm ± 5.4 cm for the LM and AM groups, respectively ( < 0.001). LMs were associated with longer surgical times ( < 0.001) and shorter hospitalizations ( = 0.001). There were no significant differences in the intraoperative and postoperative complication rates ( = 0.075 and  = 0.285 for LM and AM, respectively). The subsequent pregnancy rate was higher for the LM group (30.8% vs. 16.8%,  = 0.009), with a vaginal delivery rate of 69% and no cases of uterine rupture.
更多
查看译文
关键词
laparoscopy,myomectomy,obstetric outcome,uterine leiomyoma,uterine rupture
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要