Comparison of microscopic features of bone false starts produced by reciprocating saw blades and handsaws of the same class.

In cases of criminal dismemberment, the analysis of saw marks helps to determine the class of the saw used. The present study compared the microscopic features of experimental false starts performed on three freshly defleshed human femurs. 150 lesions were produced using three reciprocating blades and two hand saws of similar class. Two groups of tools were created according to the class of the blades: group 1 (teeth per inch = 6, alternating set) and group 2 (teeth per inch = 24, wavy set). The minimum width of the kerf was always thicker with reciprocating blades than that of the handsaw of the same class. This fact is linked to the thickness of the blades and not necessarily to the fast forth and back motion of the blades. Shape kerf profiles and shape of the walls were very confusing, with a lot of variation of the false starts caused by the reciprocating blades and the risk of misclassification (rip teeth versus crosscut teeth, alternating set versus wavy set). Striae on the kerf floor and bone islands were more consistent. The main conclusions are, first, that usual features of false starts achieved by reciprocating saw blades used in this work vary a great deal and may lead to misclassification of the saw class, and second, that no criterion has been found to differentiate reciprocating blades and handsaws. These results demonstrate that we have to be very prudent while estimating the possible saw from a false start in a real forensic case.