Distribution of the Existence Forms of Condensable Particulate Matter During Condensation: The Surface Collection and the Space Suspension Forms

Condensable particulate matter (CPM), as an air pollutant that has received wide attention in recent years, has a high emission concentration compared to filterable particulate matter (FPM), yet there is not a well-developed removal method. Air pollution control devices (APCDs) with a condensation process have a certain effect on CPM removal, which inspired us to study the condensation behavior of CPM. During the condensation process, the condensed CPM may exist in two final forms: one was collected by the cold surface that caused the condensation; the other was converted to fine particles and suspended in the space of the flue. In a sense, the surface collection form can reflect the removal of CPM, while the CPM in the space suspension form should be further separated with the aim of removal. In this work, we adopted a CPM sampling system based on EPA Method 202 to reveal the distribution of the condensation behavior of CPM. In this sampling system, the CPM collected by all the cooling surfaces, including the cooling coil and impingers, can be counted as the surface collection form, while those collected by the terminal CPM filter can be regarded as the space suspension form. It was found that about 75 % of CPM was collected by the cooling surfaces, which suggested that CPM preferred to be in the surface collection form than the space suspension form. This preference characteristic also could be observed in the inorganic (CPM) and organic components of the CPM (CPM). Among the CPM, almost all NH and SO condensed in the form of surface collection. The preference characteristics in CPM's (and its components') condensation behavior are similar under every temperature reduction condition. In this work, the interference of CPM measurement error was resolved by the statistical method of ANOVA.