Comparison of Right Anterior Mini-Thoracotomy Versus Partial Upper Sternotomy in Aortic Valve Replacement

Introduction Propensity score analysis of midterm outcomes after isolated aortic valve replacement through right anterior mini-thoracotomy and partial upper sternotomy could provide information about the most beneficial minimally invasive technique for the patient based on the preoperative risk factors. Methods Between March 2015 and February 2021, 694 minimally invasive isolated aortic valve surgeries were performed at our institution. Among these, 441 right anterior mini-thoracotomies and 253 partial upper sternotomies were performed. A propensity score analysis was performed in 202 matched pairs. Results Cardiopulmonary bypass time and cross-clamp time were significantly shorter in the right anterior mini-thoracotomy group than in the partial upper sternotomy group ( p = 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). Time to first mobilization and hospital stay were significantly shorter in the right anterior mini-thoracotomy group than in the partial upper sternotomy group ( p = 0.005, p = 0.001, respectively). A significantly lower incidence of revision surgery was noted in the right anterior mini-thoracotomy group than in the partial upper sternotomy group ( p = 0.046). No significant differences in 30-day mortality ( p = 1.000) and 1-year mortality ( p = 0.543) were noted. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates were 96.3% in the right anterior mini-thoracotomy group and 92.7% in the partial upper sternotomy group after 4 years (log rank 0.169), respectively. Conclusions Despite the technical challenges, right anterior mini-thoracotomy can be chosen as first-line strategy for isolated aortic valve replacement. For patients unsuitable for this technique, the partial upper sternotomy remains a safe method that can be performed by a wide range of surgeons.