RESPONSE TO DUMSDAY'S "PALAMISM AND DISPOSITIONALISM" with Travis Dumsday, "Palamism and Dispositionalism: Comment on Flavius Raslau's Integration of Orthodox Theology with Contemporary Metaphysics of Science" and Flavius Raslau, "Response to Dumsday's 'Palamism and Dispositionalism.'"

Recently, I proposed a theory of ontology for the God-world relation that draws inspiration from: Deacon's emergent dynamics where absence plays a role in causal work; dispositionalism as the most suitable philosophical tradition for accommodating absence as a mode of being; and Palamism as the most suitable theological framework for articulating the absence of God as presence. Dumsday's "Palamism and Dispositionalism" in the present issue of Zygon is a cogent breakdown of that thesis, exposing philosophical and theological worries that touch on pan-dispositionalism, bundle theory, Platonism, divine essence, created-uncreated distinction, God-world synergy, and more. This response article engages with the landscape of ideas that Dumsday surveys in an attempt to clarify and extend the proposed thesis that nature's powers are God's energies.