Identify differential inflammatory cellular and serology pathways between children and adult patients in the lupus registry

Background: Age variances in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) may reflect different patterns and consequences. Monocyte differentiation is critical, and cytokine and chemokine milieu may be associated with long term outcome and treatment responses. This study aims to evaluate the inflammatory cellular and serology pathways associated with age in our lupus registry. Methods: We included patients with SLE and divided them into 2 groups according to age, <= 18 or >18 years old. We performed flow cytometry analysis to define the peripheral blood monocyte differentiation pattern and phenotypes and used the multiplex method to detect cytokine and chemokine panels. The results were then compared between the 2 subgroups. Results: In total, 47 SLE patients were included in this study. Of those, 23 patients were 18 years old or younger, and 24 patients were over the age of 18 years old. An increased distribution of circulating Type 2b macrophage (M2b) subsets was found in patients over 18 years old (P < 0.01), and we found the Type 1 macrophage (M1) to demonstrate a marked increase in those patients <= 18 years old (P = .05). Eotaxin values were significantly higher in patients >18 years old (P = .03), and Macrophage Inflammatory Protein (MIP)-1alpha, MIP-1beta, Interleukine (IL)-1Ra, Interferon (IFN)-alpha2, IL-12, IL-13, IL-17A, IL-1beta, IL-2, IL-4, IL-5, IL-7, IL-9, Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein (MCP)-3, Transforming Growth Factor (TGF)-alpha, and Tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-beta were significantly higher in patients <= 18 years old (all P < .05). Conclusions: We found significant M2b polarization in adult SLE patients, and several cytokines and chemokines were significantly higher in SLE patients <= 18 years old. Peripheral blood mononuclear cell differentiation and cytokine milieu could represent composite harm from both Type 2 helper T cells (Th2) and Type 17 helper T cells (Th17) pathways and may thus be a potential therapeutic target in younger SLE patients.