Aortic valve intervention for aortic stenosis and cardiac amyloidosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Aortic stenosis with cardiac amyloidosis (CA-AS) is common in the elderly. We provide an overview and a meta-analysis of outcomes after aortic valve (AV) intervention. The primary end point was all-cause mortality. Weighted pooled analysis showed a non-significant higher risk of death in CA-AS patients following surgical or transcatheter AV replacement. After transcatheter AV replacement, the risk of death in CA-AS patients was comparable to that associated with aortic stenosis alone (risk ratio: 1.23; 95% CI: 0.77-1.96; p = 0.39; I-2 = 0%). An AV intervention is possibly not futile in CA-AS and should not be denied to patients with this condition. Plain language summary: Dual presentation of aortic stenosis (AS) and cardiac amyloidosis (CA) is common in the elderly. Patients with CA-AS face a dismal prognosis. Clinical outcomes after an aortic valve intervention are conflicting. Our data showed that there is no increased risk of death in CA-AS patients compared with patients with only AS after an aortic valve replacement. In particular, our analysis unveils that following less invasive percutaneous aortic valve replacement, rates of death of patients with concomitant CA were not significantly different from those in patients who had AS without CA. Based on this data, an aortic valve substitution procedure should not be withheld in patients with CA.