Improving undergraduate surgical education: Comparing findings from the ASiT consensus report with the RCS Undergraduate Surgical Curriculum and GMC Outcomes for Graduates

Abstract Aims Previous work by ASiT has shown that undergraduate years can have a significant impact on the decision to pursue a surgical career. The Royal College of Surgeons England launched their recommendations in the undergraduate surgical curriculum in 2015. Our aim was to ascertain whether any additional areas of importance could be highlighted. Methods A consensus document was developed, using the RCS undergraduate surgical curriculum and GMC Outcomes for Graduates as baseline guides. An external advisory group made additional recommendations for inclusion which was then presented and discussed at a face-to-face consensus session at the 2019 ASiT International Surgical Conference. A consensus threshold of 80% was accepted. Results A total of 69 ‘core’ topics were reviewed and discussed, of which 10 did not reach consensus. These topics were predominantly considered to be ‘specialist’ in nature, and were under the domains of Head and Neck/ENT, neurosurgery, paediatric or vascular surgery. Of note, knot tying, which is included in the GMC guidance, was considered beyond the required level of a graduate and more suitable for those with the interest or intent to pursue a career in surgery. Conclusions Our consensus meeting and subsequent report has highlighted differences between the current available guidance and what medical students and junior doctors consider to be ‘core’ undergraduate surgical knowledge and skills. Topics that did not meet consensus may form areas of need in early postgraduate training. Our findings should be used in addition to the RCS and GMC guidance for undergraduate surgical education.