Assessment of twenty-two SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen tests against SARS-CoV-2: A laboratory evaluation study

J. M. Deerain, T. Tran, M. B. Batty, Y. Yoga,J. Druce, C. Mackenzie,G. Taiaroa,M. Taouk, S. Chea, B. Zhang,J. Prestedge, M. Ninan,K. Carville,J. Fielding, M. Catton,D. A. Williamson

medRxiv(2021)

引用 4|浏览3
暂无评分
摘要
Background Rapid antigen testing is widely used as a way of scaling up population-level testing. To better inform antigen test deployment in Australia, we evaluated 22 commercially available antigen tests, including an assessment of culture infectivity. Methods Analytical sensitivity was evaluated against SARS-CoV-2 B.1.617.2 (Delta), reported as TCID50/mL, cycle threshold (Ct) value and viral load (RNA copies/mL). Specificity was assessed against non-SARS-CoV-2 viruses. Clinical sensitivity and correlation with cell culture infectivity was assessed using the Abbott PanBio COVID-19 Ag test. Results Nineteen kits consistently detected SARS-CoV-2 antigen equivalent to 1.3x10^6 copies/mL (5.8x10^3 TCID50/mL). Specificity for all kits was 100%. Compared to RT-PCR the Abbott PanBio COVID-19 Ag test was 52.6% (95% CI, 41.6% to 63.3%) sensitive, with a 50% detection probability for infectious cell culture at 5.9 log10 RNA copies/mL (95% CI, 5.3 to 6.5 log10 copies/mL). Antigen test sensitivity was 97.6% (95% CI, 86.3% to 100.0%) compared to positive infectious in cell culture. Conclusions Antigen test positivity correlated with positive viral culture, suggesting antigen test results may determine SARS-CoV-2 transmission risk. Sensitivity varied considerably between test kits and highlights the need for ongoing systematic post-market evaluation, providing valuable information to help guide antigen test selection and deployment.
更多
查看译文
关键词
rapid antigen tests,twenty-two,sars-cov,sars-cov
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要