On the evidence of a trend in the CO 2 airborne fraction

In a paper recently published in this journal, van Marle et al. (van Marle et al., 2022) introduce an interesting new data set for land use and land cover change CO2 emissions (LULCC) that they use to study whether a trend is present in the airborne fraction (AF), defined as the fraction of CO2 emissions remaining in the atmosphere. Testing the hypothesis of a trend in the AF has attracted much attention, with the overall consensus that no statistical evidence is found for a trend in the data (Knorr, 2009; Gloor et al., 2010; Raupach et al., 2014; Bennedsen et al., 2019). In their paper, van Marle et al. analyze the AF as implied by three different LULCC emissions time series (GCP, H&N, and their new data series). In a Monte Carlo simulation study based on their new LULCC emissions data, van Marle et al. find evidence of a declining trend in the AF. In this note, we argue that the statistical analysis presented in van Marle et al. can be improved in several respects. Specifically, the Monte Carlo study presented in van Marle et al. is not conducive to determine whether there is a trend in the AF. Further, we re-examine the evidence for a trend in the AF by using a variety of different statistical tests. The statistical evidence for an uninterrupted (positive or negative) trend in the airborne fraction remains mixed at best. When allowing for a break in the trend, there is some evidence for upward trends in both subsamples.