Neonatal and pediatric transfusion practices and policies in India: A survey-based cross-sectional assessment of blood centers

TRANSFUSION(2022)

引用 1|浏览3
暂无评分
摘要
Background Blood centers play a critical role in supporting neonatal and pediatric transfusions. We aim to study the variation in pediatric/neonatal transfusion policies and practices for blood centers in India. Study Design and Methods This is a survey-based (45 question) cross-sectional assessment of blood centers in India supporting pediatric/neonatal transfusions. Results One hundred three centers responded to the survey (response rate 51.2%; 103/201). As a part of pretransfusion testing, use of "microtainers" was reported by 58.4% (59/101) centers and only 57.4% (58/101) centers provide antibody screening. In case of absence of maternal sample, type O negative blood is most commonly used (48.5%; 49/101), and in case of ABO incompatibility, 68.3% (69/101) use units compatible with both mother and newborn. Leukoreduced RBCs are provided by 89% (90/101) centers and irradiated products are provided by 48.5% (49/101). 82% (83/101) of centers reported not receiving requests for CMV negative units considering the high incidence of CMV-seropositivity in donors. Fresh units are defined as <7 days old by 44.5% (45/101) and <5 days old by 31.6% (32/101) centers. 97% centers reported SAGM suspended RBCs in inventory but only 67.3% (68/101) use them for top-up transfusions to neonates. Overall >80% centers use the buffy-coat method for platelet concentrates preparation. Volume-based (ml/kg) aliquots preparation is done by 88% (89/101), mainly using the sterile connecting device (84.6%; 83/98). Conclusion This survey shows heterogeneity and lack of standardization in practices across blood centers in India and highlights the need for more studies to establish best practices for this vulnerable age group.
更多
查看译文
关键词
neonatal transfusion, pediatric transfusion, pedibags
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要