Physician-driven Dysphagia Screening Protocol For Expedited Medication Delivery In Acute Ischemic Stroke

Background: We implemented a multi-disciplinary process improvement (PI) intervention at a Comprehensive Stroke Center in cooperation with speech/language pathology in order to expedite oral medication delivery in patients with dysphagia. Following a failed nurse dysphagia screen, trained neurology providers were able to evaluate dysphagia further and approve the use of oral medications. Methods: We analyzed prospectively collected data from the PI intervention for timing of dysphagia screen, first oral antithrombotic, and aspiration pneumonia in ischemic stroke patients (9/2019-07/2021). Patients were included if they passed a dysphagia assessment by any provider, with comparisons made between patients who passed by physicians (Ph), nurses (RN) or speech/language pathologists (SLP). Results: Of the 789 included patients, 673 were passed by RN, 104 by SLP, and 12 by Ph. Compared to patients passed by SLP, those passed by Ph were younger and had less severe deficits (Table). Patients passed by Ph were screened more quickly than those screened by RN or SLP (median 38 vs. 182 vs. 1330 min after arrival, p=0.0001), and received first oral antithrombotic far more quickly (median 335 vs. 774 vs. 1409 min, p=0.0001). No patients passed by Ph experienced an aspiration pneumonia (0%), although there were non-significantly more pneumonias among patients passed by SLP (5%) and RN (2%, p=0.11). Conclusions: We safely conducted a physician-driven dysphagia screening paradigm which led to faster oral medication delivery, and no signal of patient harm.