Evaluation of cervical length by transabdominal and transvaginal scans during early pregnancy.

L. P. Ruwanpura, J. B. Wickramasinghe, P. Marasinghe,G. M. Ratnayake,Tiran Dias,D. Silva

Sri Lanka Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology(2021)

引用 0|浏览0
暂无评分
摘要
Objective To compare the measurements and the client-preferences of transabdominal scan (TAS) and transvaginal scan (TVS) in assessing cervical length. Method A validation study with a cross sectional component on patient-preferences was conducted among 568 pregnant women with a period-of-amenorrahea between 11+0 to 22+6 weeks. Pre- and post-void TAS and a post-void TVS measurements were taken. Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) curves were generated to assess the detection of short cervix using pre and post-void TAS at different lengths of the cervix. Results The mean (SD) age of the participants was 28.4(5.7) years with a mean gestation age of 14+1 weeks. The mean (SD) cervical lengths detected by the pre-void TAS, post-void TAS and TVS were 32.2 (5.8)mm, 28.9 (5.8) mm and 34.4 (5.3) mm respectively. Factors with significant association with a higher TVS cervical length were; increasing age (p<0.001), higher gravidity (p<0.001), higher parity (p<0.001) and higher number of vaginal deliveries (p<0.001). The TAS and TVS measurements significantly correlated with each other (p<0.001). Post-void TAS could not obtain measurement in 49.47% of attempts. The shortest cervical length can be detected by pre-void TAS was 26mm with an ideal cut-off of 33mm. For post-void TAS the shortest length was 28mm with an ideal cut-off of 28.16mm. Majority preferred TAS over TVS. Conclusion Pre-void TAS can predict a cervical length of 26mm or less with 87.5% sensitivity whereas the shortest length predicted by post-void is relatively longer. Nearly in half, a valid post-void TAS could not be recorded. Client preference was more favorable for TAS.
更多
查看译文
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要