Individualized Red-Cell Transfusion Strategy for Non-Cardiac Surgery in Adults: A Randomised Controlled Trial

Social Science Research Network(2020)

引用 0|浏览6
暂无评分
摘要
Background: We developed an individualized transfusion strategy and it might reduce red-cell requirement without compromising patients' safety as compared with restrictive and liberal strategies for surgery, in order to access the safety and cost-effectiveness of a practical individualized red-cell transfusion strategy by using the West-China-Liu's Score based on the physiology of oxygen delivery/consumption balance. Methods: This open labeled, multicenter, randomised clinical trial was conducted in 35 Chinese Hospitals from May 2012 to January 2016, with follow-up until January 2017. Among 1351 eligible patients undergoing non-cardiac surgeries, 1213 were randomised, 1182 were included in the final analysis. Patients with haemoglobin concentration <10 g per deciliter due to surgical bleeding were randomly assigned to an individualized-strategy (n=379) using the West-China-Liu's Score, a restrictive-strategy (n=419) following China's guideline, or a liberal-strategy (n=384) with transfusion threshold of haemoglobin concentration < 9.5 g per deciliter. There were two primary outcomes. First, the proportion of patients received red-cell (superiority test); Second, a composite of in-hospital complications and all-cause mortality by day-30 (noninferiority test). The secondary outcomes included allogeneic blood cost and total in-hospital cost, all-cause mortality by day-60, day-180 and 1-year, in-hospital complications and infection rate, ICU admission rate, incision healing status and length of hospital stay after surgery. Findings: The main findings were that 30.6% patients in the individualized-strategy received red-cell transfusion, less than 62.4% in the restrictive-strategy (absolute risk difference, 31.92 percentage points; 97.5% confidence interval[CI] 24.42 to 39.42; odds ratio, 3.78; 97.5%CI, 2.7 to 5.3; p<0.001) and 89.8% in the liberal-strategy (absolute risk difference, 59.24 percentage points; 97.5%CI, 52.91 to 65.57; odds ratio, 20.06; 97.5%CI, 12.74 to 31.57; p<0.001), and no differences were found for composite of in-hospital complications and mortality by day-30 among the three strategies. Interpretation: The individualized red cells transfusion strategy using the West-China-Liu's Score reduced red-cell transfusion without increase of in-hospital complications and mortality by day-30 when compared with restrictive and liberal strategies in elective non-cardiac surgeries. Trial Registration: The study protocol was registered at http://www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01597232). Funding Statement: This trial was funded by National Key R&D Program of China (2018YFC2001800), the 1-3-5 Project for disciplines of excellence, West China Hospital, and the Sichuan University Education Foundation. Declaration of Interests: The authors declare no competing interests. Ethics Approval Statement: This study protocol has been first approved by the Biological- Medical Ethical Committee of West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China on 10 January 2012, and then approved by all the participating centers successively.
更多
查看译文
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要