Laparoscopic Versus Open Distal Gastrectomy for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: Five-Year Update from the Class-01 Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND: It is not clear whether laparoscopic and open distal gastrectomy produce similar outcomes in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer. Data from a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial (CLASS-01) showed that laparoscopic distal gastrectomy did not result in inferior disease-free survival at 3 years compared with open distal gastrectomy. Here, we present 5-year overall survival data from this trial.  METHODS: From September 2012 through December 2014, we randomly assigned 1056 patients with clinical stage T2, T3, or T4a gastric cancer (without bulky nodes or distant metastases) to undergo either laparoscopic distal gastrectomy or open distal gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy in a 1:1 ratio. We compared 5-year overall survival between groups in the intent to treat population.  RESULTS: We analyzed data from 1039 patients who received curative therapy. At 5 years, the overall survival rates were 72.6% in the laparoscopic distal gastrectomy group and 76.3% in the open distal gastrectomy group (log-rank P =0.19; hazard ratio [HR], 1.17; 95% CI, 0.93–1.48; P =0.187). After we compared for competing risk events, gastric cancer-related deaths (HR, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.87–1.49; P =0.34) and deaths from other causes (HR, 1.23; 95% CI, 0.74–2.05; P =0.42) did not differ significantly between groups. Overall rates of survival did not differ significantly between groups with each tumor stage.  CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy results in similar 5-year overall survival compared to open distal gastrectomy in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer by experienced surgeons in high-volume specialized institutions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov. number, NCT01609309 FUNDING STATEMENT: This work was supported by the National Natural Science of China, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Precision Medicine for Gastrointestinal Tumor, the Key Clinical Specialty Discipline Construction Program from the National Health and Family Planning Commission of China, and the Program of Global Medical Affairs Department of Johnson & Johnson Medical Ltd. DECLARATION OF INTERESTS: None. ETHICS APPROVAL STATEMENT: Each participating center obtained institutional review board approval, according to local regulations. Patients provided written informed consent.