Acupuncture as Treatment for Female Infertility: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Kewei Quan,Chuyi Yu,Xiaohui Wen, Qiuping Lin, Naiping Wang,Hongxia Ma

Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM(2022)

引用 6|浏览0
暂无评分
摘要
We searched digital databases for relevant studies, including EMBASE, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library up to April 2021, for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the effects of acupuncture on women undergoing IVF and other treatment. We included studies with intervention groups using acupuncture and control groups consisting of no acupuncture or sham (placebo) acupuncture. Primary outcomes were clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) and live birth rate (LBR). Meta-regression and subgroup analysis were conducted on the basis of ten prespecified covariates to investigate the variances of the effects of adjuvant acupuncture on pregnancy rates and the sources of heterogeneity. Twenty-seven studies with 7676 participants were included. The results showed that the intervention group contributes more in outcomes including live birth rate (RR = 1.34; 95% CI (1.07, 1.67); < 0.05), clinical pregnancy rate (RR = 1.43; 95% CI (1.21, 1.69); < 0.05), biochemical pregnancy rate (RR = 1.42; 95% CI (1.05, 1.91); < 0.05), ongoing pregnancy rate (RR = 1.25; 95% CI (0.88, 1.79); < 0.05), adverse events (RR = 1.65; 95% CI (1.15, 2.36); < 0.05), and implantation rate (MD = 1.19; 95% CI (1.07, 1.33); < 0.05) when compared with the control group, and the difference is statistically significant. In terms of the number of oocytes retrieved, good-quality embryo rate, miscarriages, and ectopic pregnancy rate, the difference between the acupuncture group and the control group was not statistically significant. Our analysis finds a benefit of acupuncture for outcomes in women with infertility, and the number of acupuncture treatments is a potential influential factor. Given the poor reporting and methodological flaws of existing studies, studies with larger scales and better methodologies are needed to verify these findings. More double-blind RCTs equipped with high quality and large samples are expected for the improvement of the level of evidence.
更多
查看译文
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要