Regional abdominal wall nerve block versus epidural anesthesia after hepatectomy: analysis of the ACS NSQIP database

Background The aim of this study is to determine whether regional abdominal wall nerve block is a superior to epidural anesthesia (EA) after hepatectomy. Methods Patients undergoing open hepatectomy in the NSQIP targeted file (2014–2016) were identified. Those with INR > 1.5, Platelets < 100, bleeding disorders, undergoing liver ablation without resection, and spinal anesthesia were excluded. Patients with regional abdominal wall nerve block (RAB), mostly transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block, were matched (1:1) to those undergoing EA using propensity scores to adjust for baseline differences. Results Out of 1727 patients who met our inclusion criteria, 361 (21%) had RAB. Of whom 345 were matched (1:1) to those who underwent EA. The matched cohort was well-balanced regarding preoperative characteristics, extent of hepatectomy, concurrent ablations as well as biliary reconstruction. RAB was associated with shorter hospital stay (median: 6 days vs. 5 days, p = 0.007). Overall morbidity (44.1% vs. 39.4%, p = 0.217), serious morbidity (27% vs. 25.2%, p = 0.603), and mortality (2.6% vs. 2.3%, p = 0.806) were not different between the two groups. Individual complications, readmission rate, and blood transfusion were not different between the two groups. Conclusion Regional abdominal nerve block is associated with shorter hospital stay than epidural anesthesia without an increase in overall postoperative morbidity or mortality. RAB is a viable alternative anesthesia adjunct to EA in patients undergoing hepatectomy. However, given the retrospective nature of this study further studies comparing the modalities should be considered to definitively define the utility of RAB.