Comparing Patient and Provider Experiences with Atrial Fibrillation to Highlight Gaps and Opportunities for Improving Care

Background Atrial fibrillation (AF), the most common abnormal heart rhythm, places a considerable burden on patients, providers, and the US healthcare system. Objective The purpose of this qualitative study was to compare patients’ and providers’ interpretations and responses to AF symptoms and to identify where treatment can be improved to better address patient needs and well-being. Design Qualitative design using focus groups with patients (3 groups) and providers (3 groups). Participants Patients with physician-confirmed AF ( n =29) and cardiologists, primary care physicians, and cardiac nurses ( n =24). Approach Focus groups elicited patient and provider perspectives regarding the symptom experience of AF, treatment goals, and gaps in care. Patient and provider transcripts were analyzed separately, using a thematic content analysis approach, and then compared. Key Results While patients and providers described similar AF symptoms, patients’ illness experiences included a wider range of symptoms that elicited anxiety and impacted quality of life (QOL) across many biopsychosocial domains. Patients and providers prioritized different treatment goals. Providers tended to focus on controlling symptoms congruent with objective findings, minimizing stroke risk, and restoring sinus rhythm. Patients focused on improving QOL by reducing medication use or procedures. Both patients and providers struggled with patients’ cardiac-related anxiety. Patients expressed an unmet need for education and support. Conclusion Patients with AF experience a range of symptoms and QOL issues. While guidelines recommend shared-decision making, discordance between patient and provider perspectives on the importance, priority, and impact of patients’ perceived AF symptoms and consequent cardiac anxiety may result in differing treatment priorities. Starting from a perspective that contextualizes AF in the broader context of patients’ lives, prioritizes QOL, and addresses symptom-specific anxiety as a prime concern may better address patients’ unmet needs.