Service mesh circuit breaker: From panic button to performance management tool

ABSTRACTSite Reliability Engineers are at the center of two tensions: On one hand, they need to respond to alerts within a short time, to restore a non-functional system. On the other hand, short response times is disruptive to everyday life and lead to alert fatigue. To alleviate this tension, many resource management mechanisms are proposed handle overload and mitigate the faults. One recent such mechanism is circuit breaking in service meshes. Circuit breaking rejects incoming requests to protect latency at the expense of availability (successfully answered requests), but in many scenarios achieve neither due to the difficulty of knowing when to trigger circuit breaking in highly dynamic microservice environments. We propose an adaptive circuit breaking mechanism, implemented through an adaptive controller, that not only avoids overload and mitigate failure, but keeps the tail response time below a given threshold while maximizing service throughput. Our proposed controller is experimentally compared with a static circuit breaker across a wide set of overload scenarios in a testbed based on Istio and Kubernetes. The results show that our controller maintains tail response time below the given threshold 98% of the time (including cold starts) on average with an availability of 70% with 29% of requests circuit broken. This compares favorably to a static circuit breaker configuration, which features a 63% availability, 30% circuit broken requests, and more than 5% of requests timing out.