Comparative whole plastome and low copy number phylogenetics of the core Saccharinae and Sorghinae

Despite over 60 years’ worth of taxonomic efforts, the relationships between sugarcane ( Saccharum hybrid cultivars), Sorghum and their closest evolutionary relatives remain largely unresolved. Even relationships between generally accepted genera such as Miscanthus and Saccharum have not been examined in any large-scale molecular detail. Genera such as Erianthus , Miscanthidium and Narenga pose even greater taxonomic contention. Erianthus is not monophyletic and Erianthus sect. Ripidium ([Valdés and Scholz 2006][1], [Lloyd Evans et al. 2019a][2]; [Welker et al. 2019][3]) represents a distinct and separate genus, Tripidium Scholz. Miscanthidium is placed within Miscanthus by many workers, whilst the New World Erianthus species and Narenga are currently placed within Saccharum . As these species represent a significant portion of the gene pool that sugarcane breeders use for introgression into sugarcane, their taxonomic placement and relationships to Saccharum are of significant economic import. Erianthus species from the Americas have not been significantly employed in sugarcane breeding and may represent an untapped genetic resource. In an attempt to resolve the taxonomic relationships of these genera, we have assembled three novel chloroplasts, from Miscanthidium capense , Miscanthidium junceum and Narenga porphyrocoma (this latter assembled from transcriptomic and long read data). In parallel, five low copy number loci have been assembled from species within Saccharum , Miscanthus , Sarga and Sorghum . Phylogenetic analyses were performed using both low copy number genes and whole chloroplasts. The phylogenetic results were compared with karyotype data to circumscribe the genera most closely related to sugarcane. We reveal that genera Miscanthus and Saccharum are monophyletic and have never undergone polyploidization outside their own genera. Genera Erianthus , Miscanthidium and Narenga are allopolyploids, which excludes them from being members of Saccharum and Miscanthus . Moreover, all three of these genera have divergent evolutionary histories. We therefore support the use of the genera Miscanthus , Miscanthidium , Erianthus (for the New World Species) and Narenga for those species and genera most closely allied to Saccharum. Our data demonstrate that all these genera should be excluded from Saccharum sensu lato . ### Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. [1]: #ref-50 [2]: #ref-29 [3]: #ref-53