Usefulness of different screening questionnaires and scoring systems for obstructive sleep apnea in patients with atrial fibrillation

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: Public Institution(s). Main funding source(s): This study is part of Limburg Clinical Research Center, supported by the foundation Limburg Sterk Merk, province of Limburg, Flemish government, Hasselt University, Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg and Jessa Hospital. OnBehalf Research Group Cardiovascular Diseases, University of Antwerp Background Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) influences the progression of atrial fibrillation (AF) but is underdiagnosed in this population. Studies have shown that its treatment can help to reduce AF recurrences and improve symptoms. Polysomnography (PSG) is currently the gold standard for diagnosing OSA but being expensive and requiring overnight examination it is therefore not the ideal screening method. Different OSA screening tools such as questionnaires and scoring systems already exist but their value in AF patients remains unclear. Purpose The aim of this study was to examine the performance of different screening questionnaires and scoring systems for diagnosing OSA in an AF cohort, compared with PSG as gold standard. Methods Prospective study of the predictive performance of seven screening questionnaires and scoring systems (the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), the Berlin Questionnaire (BQ), Sleep Apnea Clinical Score (SACS), OSA50, STOP-BANG, NoSAS, MOODS) in consecutive AF patients referred to two sleep clinics. Results A total of 100 AF patients presenting for PSG were included (64.0 ± 8.6 years, 73% male, 87% non-permanent AF, mean Body Mass Index 30.6 ± 5.9 kg/m2, mean CHA2DS2-VASc score 2.4 ± 1.7, mEHRA≥2 in 64%; mean AF history 5.4 ± 5.6 years). Forty-two percent of patients were referred to the sleep clinic by cardiologists. PSG diagnosed ≥mild OSA in 90% of patients, ≥moderate in 69%, and severe OSA in 33%. In screening for mild OSA, NoSAS, STOP-BANG and MOODS screening questionnaires had a fair area under the curve (AUC) of 0.773, 0.710 and 0.709 respectively. For at least moderate OSA, only the SACS and the NoSAS questionnaires had an AUC of 0.704 and 0.712 respectively (Figure 1). None of the seven screening questionnaires/scoring systems were performant enough (i.e. a fair AUC > 0.7) to detect severe OSA. Conclusions Our analysis shows that screening questionnaires and scoring systems such as ESS, BQ, SACS, NoSAS, OSA50, STOP-BANG and MOODS are not very useful to predict clinically relevant OSA (i.e. at least moderate OSA) in AF patients. Therefore, other screening modalities for OSA in AF patients should be investigated and validated. Abstract Figure 1