Untangling biomechanical differences in perturbation-induced stepping strategies for lateral balance stability in older individuals

When recovering balance from a lateral perturbation, younger adults tend to stabilize balance with a single lateral sidestep while older adults often take multistep responses. Using multiple steps to recover balance is consistently associated with increased fall risk, altered body center of mass (CoM) control and instability. The aim of this study was to compare the spatio-temporal stepping characteristics and the margin of stability (MoS) of single lateral sidesteps (LSS1) with the first and second steps of a two-step protective step sequence. Two-step sequences begin with either a cross-over step to the front or back, or a medial step followed by a lateral sidestep. Seventy-one older adults received random lateral waist-pull perturbations to either side. We hypothesized that LSS1 would be more stable (larger MoS) than either step in a two-step sequence. With some exceptions, utilizing a two-step sequence was associated with a reduced CoM velocity and distance between the base of support and CoM and decreased stability in the frontal plane following limb loading of the first and second step. There were no differences in the time available to arrest the extrapolated CoM at the end of a single lateral sidestep or the final step of a two-step sequence. Two-step sequences involving a cross-over step include more complex stepping trajectories and also challeng stability in the sagittal plane requiring a multidimensional balance correction. These results indicate important step type differences in center of mass control in recovering balance with a single lateral sidestep as opposed to a two-step sequence among older adults.