Gemcitabine Plus Vinore lb ine Compared With Cisplat in Plus Vinore lb ine or Cisplat in Plus Gemci tabine for Advanced Non – Smal l-Cel l Lung Cancer : A Phase III Tria

Ciro Gallo,Frances A. Shepherd,Francovito Piantedosi, Sergio Federico Robbiati, Luigi Manzione,Santi Barbera,Luciano Frontini,Enzo Veltri, Brian Findlay, Silvio Cigolari, Robert Myers, Giovanni P. Ianniello,Vittorio Gebbia,Giampietro Gasparini, Sergio Fava,Vera Hirsh,Andrea Bezjak,Lesley Seymour,Francesco Perrone

semanticscholar(2003)

引用 0|浏览0
暂无评分
摘要
Purpose: Platinum-containing chemotherapy regimens are the standard treatment for patients with advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), although toxicity is common and may significantly affect the patient’s quality of life (QoL). This trial aimed to assess whether a combination of gemcitabine and vinorelbine had benefits in terms of QoL, without influencing negatively on survival, compared with cisplatin-containing regimens. Patients and Methods: Patients with stage IIIB (effusion and supraclavicular nodes) or IV documented NSCLC who were younger than 70 years of age were randomly assigned gemcitabine plus vinorelbine (GemVin) or either gemcitabine plus cisplatin or vinorelbine plus cisplatin (cisplatin-based). European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer scales were used for QoL analysis. Results: Five hundred one patients were randomly assigned to treatment. The median age was 62 years. There were no significant differences in global QoL scores between the two arms after 2 months of treatment. However, worsening scores for appetite, vomiting, and alopecia were significantly more common in the cisplatin-based arm. Median survival was 38 v 32 weeks and median progressionfree survival was 23 v 17 weeks in the cisplatin-based versus GemVin arms, respectively. For the GemVin arm the hazard ratio for death was 1.15 (90% confidence interval [CI], 0.96 to 1.37) and the hazard ratio for progression was 1.29 (90% CI, 1.10 to 1.52). Grade 3 or 4 myelosuppression, vomiting, alopecia, and ototoxicity were significantly more frequent with cisplatin-based treatment. Conclusion: Global QoL is not improved with GemVin, although advantages in some components of QoL were apparent. GemVin is less toxic than standard cisplatinbased chemotherapy. There is a nonsignificant slight survival advantage with cisplatin-based chemotherapy. GemVin could be offered to advanced NSCLC patients who express concern about toxicity. J Clin Oncol 21:3025-3034. © 2003 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.
更多
查看译文
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要