An Investigation Into Interpersonal and Peripersonal Spaces of Chinese People for Different Directions and Genders.

FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY(2020)

引用 8|浏览4
暂无评分
摘要
This study explores the interpersonal space (IPS) and peripersonal space (PPS) of Chinese people and evaluates the relationship between the two spaces for different directions and genders. Seventy-one participants were recruited for this study. Participants were required to determine their IPS in eight directions (0 degrees, 45 degrees, 90 degrees, 135 degrees, 180 degrees, 225 degrees, 270 degrees, 315 degrees) when approached by male or female confederates in the comfort distance task. Each participant was also asked to judge their PPS in five directions (0 degrees, 45 degrees, 90 degrees, 270 degrees, 315 degrees) following the same procedure. Results showed that their IPS was significantly influenced by direction (p< 0.05), with the largest distance in the front (0 degrees) and the closest distance in the rear (135 degrees, 180 degrees, 225 degrees), indicating non-circular IPS among Chinese subjects. Moreover, the PPS on the right side (90 degrees) was larger than in other directions (0 degrees, 45 degrees, 270 degrees, 315 degrees). Participants maintained larger IPS than PPS in the front, but the IPS was closer than PPS on the right and left sides. When facing a female confederate, larger IPS was preferred than PPS, whereas the opposite held true when facing a male confederate. Comparison of participants' arm length and PPS showed that the reachability distance was overestimated in the front but underestimated laterally. The findings of this study can be applied to environmental design, space utilization, and social interaction.
更多
查看译文
关键词
interpersonal space,peripersonal space,spatial judgment,direction,gender difference
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要