Neutral leakage, power dissipation and pedestal fueling in open vs closed divertors

The effect of divertor closure on neutral leakage, power dissipation and pedestal fueling is investigated using the SOLPS code for different densities including attached and detached divertor conditions for DIII-D open and closed divertors. In this work, a metric for divertor closure in terms of the percentage of neutrals escaping the divertor is presented. At the detachment onset the population of neutrals escaping the divertor is 12% for the closed divertor and 35% for the open divertor. This results in a lower contribution of the convective term to the total heat flux and increased power losses in the closed divertor. The comparison between the two geometries reveals that for the same upstream density, the upstream temperature is 23% higher in the closed divertor. The physical mechanisms for detachment at lower upstream density in the closed divertor are also identified with the reduction of the convective term directly resulting in 40% decrease and the increased power losses contributing with a factor of 2. The baffling also lowers the neutral flux refueling the pedestal resulting in further reduction of the core density for achieving detachment. The results presented here show that the divertor recycling is the primary fueling mechanism in DIII-D. It is shown that fueling occurring in the region between the X-point and the outer midplane is at least four times lower in the closed divertor due the baffling structure which enhances target neutral trapping and consequently reduced upstream leakage. Due to the openness of the inner leg to the common flux and HFS regions both open and closed divertor experience almost identical fueling at the HFS highlighting the need to also consider the inboard divertor for shape optimization.