Effectiveness Of Fingolimod Versus Natalizumab As Second-Line Therapy For Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis In Spain: Second-Line Gate Study

Jose Meca-Lallana,Teresa Ayuso, Sergio Martinez-Yelamos,Carmen Duran, Yessica Contreras Martin, Nicolas Herrera Navarro, Angel Perez Sempere,Jose C. Alvarez-Cermeno,Jorge Millan Pascual,Virginia Meca-Lallana, Raul Romero Sevilla, Javier Ricart

EUROPEAN NEUROLOGY(2020)

引用 6|浏览21
暂无评分
摘要
Background: There is a lack of head-to-head studies comparing the efficacy of fingolimod (FIN) and natalizumab (NTZ) as second-line therapy for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). Methods: Multicenter, observational study, in which, information of 388 patients randomly selected and treated with FIN or NTZ in routine clinical practice was retrospectively collected with the main objective of comparing the annualized relapse rate (ARR) over the first year, after FIN or NTZ treatment initiation. Results: Mean ARR during the first year of treatment was 0.28 in FIN group and 0.12 in NTZ group (p = 0.0064); nevertheless, the difference between groups lost statistical significance when the propensity score analysis was performed. Time to disability -progression was similar in both treatment groups (12.3 +/- 6.7 months in FIN, and 12.8 +/- 0.1 months in NTZ; p = 0.4654). Treatment persistence after the first year of treatment was higher in patients treated with FIN (95%) than in those treated with NTZ (84%; p = 0.0014). Conclusions: After 12 months of treatment, both FIN and NTZ reduced the ARR, but ARR percent reduction was significantly higher with NTZ. Treatment persistence was higher in patients receiving FIN.
更多
查看译文
关键词
Multiple sclerosis,Second-line treatment,Effectiveness,Fingolimod,Natalizumab
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要